part of the reason is that the theory of regexes boils everything down to a single yes/no question - does this string match or not? that's clean and great for proving theorems, but it throws away nearly everything that matters in practice: where the matches are, how long they are, and how many there are. once you reduce regexes to "match or no match", the all-matches problem simply disappears from view. whether experts are consciously ignoring it or the framing just doesn't surface it as a question, i can't tell - and i won't hold it against them. but it really does make me question the value of those theorems. if you have to throw away the connection to real-world use, what exactly is it a theory of?
Экономист перечислил возможные перспективы цен на нефть14:37
，详情可参考免实名服务器
�@���ɕ]�������Ă����̂��uPRO B550M-B�v���B�p�\�R���H�[ �H�t���p�[�c�ق́u�ǂ������V�K�ɍ����Ă������ł����ǁAPRO B550M-B�̕��́i�`�b�v�Z�b�g�I�ɖ{���ΏۊO�́jRyzen 3000 G�V���[�Y�����삷�����ă��[�J�[�̑Ή����X�g�ɍڂ��Ă������ł����BRyzen 5 3400G��3200G�Ƃ�����APU�Ƒg�ݍ��킹�đg�ނȂ炩�Ȃ��\�Z���}�������܂����A�����I�����ɂȂ��܂����ˁv�ƃv�b�V�����Ă����B
Поездка Трампа в Китай столкнулась с неопределенностью08:47
In the sediments several feet above, another three Neanderthals dating to around 50,000 years had been found by Solecki, more of which have been recovered by the current team.